+32 16 462796 pkoninckx@gmail.com
Embed Code Popup Demo

Informed consent for surgery in gynecology

Medico-legally required

Informed consent for gynecologic surgery requires information

Deep endometriosis nodule

Of the diagnosis and planned surgery

Informed consent for gynecologic surgery requires information

at least those risks>1%

of the risks and complications

Informed consent before gynecologic surgery requires information

Also those not performed by the surgeon

Of alternative therapies

Full Videoregistration of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery

with a copy to you ?

Patients Rights in the EU    http://europatientrights.eu/

The patient has the right to consent well informed, freely and in advance to any service provided by a health professional. The consent of the patient is only valid for the medical intervention consented to……see full text   

Click for Belgium      Click for Italy      More information for other European countries

Consent is clear

There is much confusion about which information has to be given

Scientifically correct = the actual state of the art

versus

Medico-legally correct = the knowledge and practice of the median gynecologist

line
Informed consent

Informed Consent

line

What is the problem of information ?

Complete, precise and detailed information requires a medical back-ground to fully understand subtle differences. Information should therefore be given in an understandable language. The medical language was developed to facilitate exact communication, between doctors. Without the medical language information tend to become imprecise.

Not all information is wise to give.
line

Information that is important to give “informed” consent

1. What is the diagnosis ?

  • The problem is to understand how certain the diagnosis is ? and what the margin of error is.
  • Medico-legally a “correct diagnosis” is the diagnosis that at that moment would have been made by the medium gynecologist - not by an expert.

3. Which surgery is planned and what are the risks ?

  • The standard of care for a given country at a certain point in time is not necessarily the best care available at that moment. The prevailing medico-legal standard to judge an intervention is ‘the median standard of care in that country at a given moment’ . This is translated by professional bodies into ‘Guidelines’.
  • It is accepted that all risks with an incidence higher than 1% should be mentioned.

4. What are the alternative options ?

  • Information is generally limited to the techniques performed by that surgeon in that hospital at that moment
    • Medico-legally the standard of care is the median standard of care in a country at a given moment’ and information should thus be given on all alternative “median standards of care” .
    • This median standard of care is not necessarily the best care available (e.g. hysterectomy by open surgery or laparoscopically). It is unclear when new alternatives become mainstream knowledge. An example : Today the numerous advantages of a laparoscopic hysterectomy are well established but the prevalence of laparoscopic hysterectomy still is only 10% to 30%.
    • Information thus will vary with the level of (sub)-specialisation of the surgeon, and between opinion leaders and general practitioners.
  • Our principle is to give information on all alternative treatments currently discussed at international meetings, including those we do not perform ourselves.

5. What can be decided during surgery ?

  • Almost everything can be decided during surgery since
    • it is not clearly defined what  ‘unexpected’  findings and emergency situations are.
    • in the absence of videoregistration most situations cannot be ascertained afterwards
  • We therefore explicitly ask the patient which interventions she does not want   eg
    • removal of a normal ovary
    • when the intervention is outside the comfort zone of the surgeon eg  deep endometriosis or cancer.  Half an intervention immediately or a referral later eg  an hysterectomy while leaving the deep endometriosis .

6. What are the results and complications of this surgeon for this intervention ?

We give information.

  • of our experience
  • our results
  • our complications

Results improve and complications decrease with experience . Results and complications in the peer reviewed literature, are biased

  • either reported by centres of excellent surgery devoted to a specific pathology which have more expertise but also treat more severe pathology..
  • or complication reviews of countries with incidences which are higher, highlighting the difference between the standard of care and the best care available.

6. video-registration of the entire intervention ?

Without systematic video-registration of the entire intervention it is impossible to judge

  • The quality of surgery eg a complete removal of endometriosis or an avoidable bowel resection
  • What is necessary surgery and are complications a re e.g. a ureter lesion for deep endometriosis excision in association with an hydronefrosis often is necessary to be complete.  We reported 18% lesions. The same holds true for the 5-1% late bowel perforations after deep endometriosis excisions.

For this reason video-registration is standard for our group. In addition we try to publish our complications in an effort to discuss prevention, and in order to help others.

The ideal informed consent

  • which information was given
  • by whom
  • the accuracy of the diagnosis and what the probability is that the diagnosis is wrong
  • the intended intervention
  • the alternative treatments not chosen
  • the expected results of surgery. ie the personal results of this surgeon for this intervention .
  • which intervention the patient does wants not to have , e.g. removal of an ovary or a uterus.
  • Complications of surgery . At least the standard reported complications should be mentioned. Better are personal data, preferably published in the peer review literature.
  • whether the intervention will be video-recorded and whether you will get a copy
  • who gave the consent to do a specific intervention e.g. the parents for minors.
  • eventual additional consent : e.g. to store data of the patient in a database for later scientific use, to store blood, fluid or tissue samples for later research use.

Practical questions to ask before giving informed consent

The consent you give should be clear and unequivocal. Below are some guidelines of information the patient should have before signing informed consent for endometriosis surgery.

What is the personal percipience of the surgeon To judge this ask the number of cases operated per year and the total number already operated. More specifically ask how many deep endometriosis lesions of more than 2 cm in diameter have been treated.  We did operate some 400 women with endometriosis/ year and operated more than 4000 deep endometriosis.

Which type of surgery will be performed  This should be explained in detail and best written unequivocally in the informed consent. The reason why this is important, is the discrepancy between the the best available treatment and the treatment which is used by the median surgeon in a country or region at a given moment. The latter is what is defined medico-legally as a normal treatment, unless defined otherwise in the informed consent. Specifically for endometriosis I consider it important that the surgeon will excise cystic ovarian endometriosis of less than 5 cm diameter (Coagulation/vaporisation only is associated with a higher recurrence rate and is often is a symptom of less experience), that large cystic ovarian endometriosis of more than 6-7 cm will be treated as a two step procedure unless in women over 40 years with only pain symptoms where removal of the ovary can be considered since easier. It should be clear how deep endometriosis be handled.  If the surgeon is not experienced to excise deep endometriosis, it fair that an unexpected deep endometriosis will not be treated and that the patient is referred to somebody with experience.

What is the risk that a laparotomy or other unexpected surgery?  We estimate these risks are as follows :

  • for subtle and typical endometriosis :until today 0% ;
  • for cystic ovarian endometriosis : until today I never removed an ovary and since 1995 I never performed a laparotomy for cystic ovarian endometriosis unless agreed clearly before surgery.
  • For deep recto-vaginal endometriosis : since 1995 and until today all patients even with large nodules up to 6 cm in diameter  have been treated without one laparotomy ; for larger deep sigmoid endometriosis it sometimes is preferable to do a sigmoid resection anastomosis -in our experience some 10 %-.
  • The risk of an hysterectomy clearly is 0%.

Is the surgeon prepared to tape the whole procedure and give you a copy of the surgery. This probably will be charged extra because of the work involved. It anyway give a good estimate of the confidence of the surgeon, his  surgical skills and experience. An often heard criticism is that this will show any mistakes or errors and that this is actually unacceptable in the medico-legal climate we are living in. I believe that the best relationship is an open one, where the patients knows what the experience of the surgeon is, knowing that nobody is perfect and that any surgeon will make occasionally a mistake -errare humanum est.

Share This

Shiny Trinket

Shiny trinkets are shiny.